Site Selection Criteria Survey Results
| Place of Residence |
Favor |
Percent |
Oppose |
Percent |
No. Opinion or Neutral |
Percent |
| Pinellas Co. |
74 |
65 |
35 |
31 |
5 |
4 |
| Pasco Co. |
55 |
59 |
31 |
33 |
8 |
9 |
| No Address Given |
40 |
62 |
23 |
35 |
2 |
3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
169 |
62 |
89 |
33 |
15 |
5 |
What benefits do you see the plant bringing to your community?
| Response |
No. of Times Mentioned |
Percent |
| Water Supply/Reduced Dependence on Groundwater |
155 |
55 |
| None |
62 |
22 |
| Jobs/Economic Benefits |
34 |
12 |
| Good drinking water quality |
32 |
11 |
| Education |
1 |
0 |
| |
|
|
| Total Responses |
284 |
100 |
What concerns do you have about having the plant in your area?
| Response |
No. of Times Mentioned |
Percent |
| Effect on marine environment |
94 |
25 |
| None |
57 |
15 |
| Appearance/odor/noise |
41 |
11 |
| Cost of water |
33 |
9 |
| Pollution |
32 |
9 |
| Traffic |
23 |
6 |
| Effect on sponging and fishing industry |
17 |
4 |
| Proximity to Stauffer site |
17 |
4 |
| Effect on property values |
13 |
3 |
| Effect on wildlife |
11 |
3 |
| Effect on tourism |
10 |
3 |
| Effect on recreation |
8 |
2 |
| Deep injection effect on aquifer |
6 |
2 |
| security |
5 |
1 |
| Existing water quality in Anclote River |
4 |
1 |
| Power Shortage |
2 |
1 |
| Other * |
5 |
1 |
| |
|
|
| Total Responses |
378 |
100 |
- That the effluents from the water plant and power plant do not injure the community
- That it won’t be large enough to allow us to continue to grow
- Possible Accidents
- What happens to the golf course
- No contact whatsoever with humans – dumping area, etc. should be away from humans
If you were to rank the following factors when deciding where to build the plant, what order would you put them in? Please rank the following with #1 being the most important.
| Criterion |
No. of 1st, 2nd, or 3rd place rankings |
No. of 8th, 9th, 10th, place rankings |
Cost of plant and cost of water |
136 |
31 |
Drinking water quality |
131 |
39 |
Effect on fishing |
104 |
25 |
Disturbance to seagrass |
94 |
48 |
Odor from plant |
79 |
44 |
Disturbance to sponging |
53 |
67 |
Noise from plant operations |
50 |
48 |
Appearance of plant |
41 |
87 |
Effect on recreation and tourism |
34 |
69 |
| Traffic/safety |
33 |
103 |
What are some of the special qualities of your community that should be considered when deciding where a seawater desalination plant should be developed?
| Response |
No. of Times Mentioned |
Percent |
| Marine resources-sponging,fishing, seagrass beds |
34 |
19 |
| Residential neighborhoods, homes |
31 |
17 |
| Parks, recreation, boating and fishing |
27 |
15 |
| Tourist area, culturally unique, quaint (Tarpon Springs) |
23 |
13 |
| Availability of Anclote power plant |
18 |
10 |
| Beautiful coastline/waterfront community (Tarpon Springs) |
14 |
8 |
| Non-industrial character/appearance |
8 |
4 |
| Available space/not crowded/not built out |
8 |
4 |
| Small, quite, family oriented |
8 |
4 |
| Traffic congestion |
7 |
4 |
| Close to source of water/close to users |
4 |
2 |
| Other * |
1 |
0 |
| |
|
|
| Total Responses |
183 |
100 |
- Not being dependent upon a single entity to generate tax dollars